索尼CEO平井一夫：人工智能和机器人拥有巨大潜力

I have sent you a note about a page you started

百度 　祖忠人摄　　“Follow　me京剧跟我学”时尚课堂是一个按课时进行收费、全部由专业演员担任教学的戏曲业余培训班。

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Bajinder Singh. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

? SunDawn ? (contact) 08:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uttarayani Fair has been accepted

Uttarayani Fair, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taabii (talk) 06:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Floods in Venezuela. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A brief article, but a topic that warrants coverage here and doesn't seem to duplicate existing content. It would be helpful to include other events here, and perhaps move to having a category to cover the floods, as we have for other types of natural disasters in Venezuala.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@Klbrain: I am thinking to add the list of floods to in the same page that I had created mentioning all the floods events that have occured in the country!! JesusisGreat7 (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Klbrain (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

IRC Cloak

Hi JesusisGreat7. I recently approved a cloak for your account on IRC, but unfortunately I made a mistake when checking your eligibility for the cloak. You currently are not eligible for a Wikimedia cloak on IRC due to your Wikipedia account not yet being 3 months old. I'm not going to remove the cloak only to re-add it in a week or two, but please bear this in mind in places that your cloak gives you privileges you shouldn't make use of those privileges yet. stwalkerster (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Sure, I will wait for the timeline thanks for approving my cloak, I promise I will work for the betterment of the community!! JesusisGreat7 (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Updation

Requesting updation of chess grand tour Romania classic 2025 as the event has already finished. 117.202.83.197 (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I’m not familiar with chess, so I’m unable to update the event, sorry about that! ?? Jesus isGreat7 ?? | ?? Royal Talk 06:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Mother Teresa Birth Centenary commemorative coin. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This article appears to have few (or no) other articles linking to it. If possible, you should look for other, related topics, and edit them to include links to this article (if appropriate).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

@Noleander Thanks! I’ve linked it to the Coins of the Indian Rupee article. I’ll definitely find more soon! Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 04:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Henry Budden (missionary) has been accepted

John Henry Budden (missionary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Old-AgedKid (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@Old-AgedKid Thanks! :)) Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 11:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghughutiya Festival has been accepted

Ghughutiya Festival, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

??Counter-Strike:Mention 269???^{(??? ● ?? ● ??)} 05:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

NPPHOUR reminder

Thanks for your tagging of Waldia (surname)! I noticed that you tagged the page well within an hour of its creation. Per WP:NPPHOUR, patrollers are supposed to wait at least an hour from the last meaningful contribution before tagging a page (except speedy criteria). This mostly serves to give editors (especially newcomers) a chance to continue working on the page without feeling they are immediately harassed. In the future, please try to wait at least an hour before tagging pages in this way.

Happy editing! Garsh (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

@Garsh2 Sorry, but the page does not cite any sources at all. I also removed several errors and promotional lines that appeared to be AI-generated, which may be considered spam. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Of course you are free to constructively edit the article within one hour. The hour policy is only for maintenance tags and draftification. The idea is that even though the article may clearly have no sources, the original author is considered to still be working on the article since it was edited within an hour. Garsh (talk) 17:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

@Garsh2 Got it. I'll keep this in mind next time. Thanks for the reminder! Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Follow-up on Zack Zook Draft Submission

Hello JesusisGreat7,

Thank you for reviewing my draft submission on Zack Zook. I appreciate your time and the guidance provided. I’d like to clarify that multiple references in the draft meet the notability criteria as outlined in WP:N and WP:BIO — including significant coverage in The New York Times, Publishers Weekly, Brooklyn Magazine, and WTJX (PBS affiliate), among others. These are reliable, independent secondary sources with substantial detail about the subject’s work and public contributions.

I’m happy to improve the article in any specific areas you believe are lacking or need formatting adjustments. Please feel free to advise. I’m following Wikipedia’s COI guidelines and welcome community input.

Thank you again for your time. Baranauma (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Baranauma, the draft was mainly rejected because the lead lacks citations for major claims (per WP:LEADCITE), the tone needs to be more formal (per WP:NPOV), and it currently reads like an advertisement. Once these are fixed, feel free to resubmit. Let me know if you have any questions! Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 19:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @JesusisGreat7, thanks for the helpful feedback. I’ve revised the lead to include inline citations for major claims (per WP:LEADCITE), formalized the tone throughout the draft to meet WP:NPOV standards, and removed promotional language. Additional third-party sources have also been added to support content across sections. I’ve resubmitted the draft for review — appreciate your time! Baranauma (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Follow-up on Correns Corporation Draft submission

Hello @JesusisGreat7,

thank you for reviewing my draft about Correns Corporation. Kindly be asked to point out which sources are from your point of view not adequate and why exactly. I have now often seen this boiler plate with 4 criterias, but conclude that my resources meet those criterias. Nevertheless, kindly be asked to help to sit straight and learn why my sources may not be suitable. Merged account (talk) 02:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Snow Revolution

Russia and South Ossetia ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. Moreover, THE OSSETIAN SNOW REVOLUTION WAS EARLIER. These are two different events. 31.202.71.56 (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Please note that the title "Snow Revolution" has already been redirected to the article on the 2011–2013 Russian protests. To avoid confusion, I have changed the draft title to "2011 South Ossetia election protests." You may continue your work and improve the draft under this revised title. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 08:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation review on Forest Heights, Calgary

Hello JesusisGreat7. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Forest Heights, Calgary is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Forest Heights, Calgary will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Follow up on Draft: Salman Shaheen

Hi there - thank you for your recent review of my draft. I consulted with the live help desk who didn't think the piece read as overly promotional, suggesting I could "tighten up some of the language, [as] some of it is a bit emotive." I've gone ahead and tried to address that, but before I resubmitted the page, I wanted to check with you if you would accept a tightened version of the page that follows those instructions, or if there was any other advice on further changes you would like to see me make? Many thanks. AlfredKlein99 (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @AlfredKlein99, thanks for the update. The draft looks fine now. If you'd like to tighten it further, consider adding an infobox. Also, if there are any more independent sources, feel free to include them. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 10:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you kindly, @JesusisGreat7! Will do. AlfredKlein99 (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and added the infobox as you'd suggested @JesusisGreat7 and resubmitted. I don't suppose you'd be able to review the draft now and approve if its looking up to scratch? AlfredKlein99 (talk) 13:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

A.A.Murakami Rejected

Hi, I would like to ask for some advice. I feel that I didn't write anything that was opinionated and I thought I was being pretty neutral. Can you help me point out two instances where I wasn't being neutral so I can get a better idea please? Thank you. Khh57 (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

@Khh57 Hi, Just to clarify, the draft wasn’t rejected, only declined. It still needs some work. Right now, it reads a bit like a résumé, and the line “A.A. Murakami frequently draws inspiration from ancient cultures and historical traditions” is backed by a personal user website, which isn’t a reliable source. Once these issues are fixed, consider resubmitting it. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 06:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. Yes, I meant declined sorry for the wrong word. New to this! Khh57 (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kashvi (name)

Hello, JesusisGreat7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kashvi (name), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Requesting a second look at Mark Goodall draft

Hi @JesusisGreat7, I’ve revised the Draft:Mark Goodall article to address your earlier feedback. I've added independent, reliable sources including a review in Popular Music (Cambridge University Press) and an article in Crooked Marquee. I’ve also removed promotional tone per your note. I’d be grateful if you’d consider taking another look when you have time. Thank you! Albieabbiati (talk) 16:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

@Albieabbiati Thanks for the update! Feel free to add an infobox if you want to tighten it up more. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Femke. I wanted to let you know that your signature does not meet the requirements for signature appearances. Your signature may have too little contrast. You can use a tool to check the contrast to determine if you're signature meets the minimum contrast ratio of 4.5. If you have any questions, feel free to reply or ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Femke ?? (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ishita (given name)

Hello, JesusisGreat7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ishita (given name), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

AfC declines

Hi there, I'm here via Draft:Howard Ellis Cox Jr. and I see from earlier posts on your talk page that this isn't a one-time issue. I don't see anything at all wrong with the tone of this draft - can you explain why you declined it? -- asilvering (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Gyokusendō Cave. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

? SunDawn ? Contact me! 09:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Droese has been accepted

Ernest Droese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 04:11, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Nabati Cave. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Korean 50,000 won vouchers has been accepted

North Korean 50,000 won vouchers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 02:40, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park Place, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania has been accepted

Park Place, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 15:47, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Request for clarification

Hi Jesusisgreat7, thanks for reviewing Siggebohyttan. Could you please clarify the grounds for rejection. I wrote the page because the two existing wikipedia sites, in Swedish and French, aren't very disciplined. I felt that they didn't do justice to a Swedish historical site that has been a museum since 1929 and which represents a critical exhibition of the rise of peasant mining in Sweden. I could see how it could create an impression of boosterism because I was trying to explain the connection between the rise of iron mining and the monumental scale of this odd miner's house, built in a style which is kind of weird for such a rich peasant. Are you advising that I should just cut out all the stuff about iron mining and its importance to Swedish economic growth? Finally, it's really hard to find good source material as the museum is quite old and the most recent monographs are pretty hard to track down, which is why I used more general sourcing based upon these sources. Finally, I am not sure I understand the idea that I created this using AI. It's all my own writing but in my search for sources I used chatgpt. I am having a problem sourcing material for this article. This is why I think it's important. It's a significant historical site in Sweden but it's insufficiently reported upon. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HadamarMan (talk ? contribs) 14:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

@HadamarMan Wikipedia isn’t the place for original research or unsourced interpretation. Around two-thirds of the draft appears AI-generated. Claims about Swedish economic growth without solid sources? That’s not how we do history here. Maybe time for a rewrite? You might also want to read Wikipedia:Large language models, that should help clarify things. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 16:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

thanks very much for the clarification. In the interests of brevity I'd excluded documentation on Swedish economic growth as I had thought it such a matter of general knowledge it was unnecessary to document. Happy to do so since it's easy to prove. I didn't generate the document with AI so I don't know where that impression came from. I am a historian. Happy to edit however. Don't see much original research in the draft. I can document it all if you'd like. Happy to do so. Siggebohyttan has been a museum and ?rebro historic site welcoming tens of thousands of visitors for almost a century of continuous operation. I didn't think it necessary to document so extensively for that reason; there's lots out there. Just not on Wikipedia in English

. Thanks. HadamarMan (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Draftification

Hello, JesusisGreat7,

Please review WP:DRAFTIFY so you are more familiar with the circumstances that allow for moving an article from main space to Draft space. An editor has the right to object to draftification and move the article back to main space and the article shouldn't be draftified more than once (as you did with Draft:Umang Bhardwaj). Please look at the page history so you are sure the article has not already been draftified.

If it has, and you find the article is substandard, you can either work on improving it yourself, tag the page with notes to what problems it has or pursue one of our forms of article deletion if you think the article is not salvageable. If you have questions on draftification, there is always the Teahouse or you can ask a more experienced editor or admin for help. Thank you for all of your contributions! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@Liz Thanks for the reminder! I'll keep it in mind next time :)) Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:58, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

To add to this, please avoid draftifying articles that are currently listed at AfD, as you did at Draft:Gruha Jyoti. Whilst there is not a rule specifically banning this, it is strongly advised against. Best, CoconutOctopus talk 18:16, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@CoconutOctopus Thanks, I'll take a note of both the points mentioned above!! Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 18:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Your review!

Hi,

You recently rejected Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia on grounds of LLM use. Given several many hours of work on the draft article finding sources and adding properly is well evident in the history of the page and you can see clearly that it has been edited for over many hours word by word or point by point in 2 days. There is no LLM use here and contradicts well attribution of each fact in all modern scholarly sources per non-British time period WP:RAJ. I have quoted all the data in references that will need verification for intro as well. Kindly recheck the history and review it again.

Reply as left on the notification by me -

"I don't think there is any part of the draft that may feel like LLM creation as you can check it's history very easily. It has been added and edited for several days word to word by me. As a reviewer, that comment is vague and incomprehensible per the policies as it fits well in the criterias to be accepted with properly attributed sources and data. Kindly take a look at it's history as I removed almost any grammatical errors or others to make it a perfectly attributed and well written article in multiple days of work. Thanks!" HilssaMansen19Irien1291S ? spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 18:58, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Baher Abdulhai

Hi @JesusisGreat7. Thank you for reviewing this draft. I did not use an LLM to write any part of this draft. However, I have assessed it for all the points mentioned in your rejection message, including promotional tone and essay-like writing. I have removed and changed some text to fix those issues. You may see my edits in this revision. Please take a look when you have time. HRShami (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

AfC LLM declines

Hi JesusisGreat7. I was reviewing Draft:A Critical Review of the Publick Buildings, Statues and Ornaments in and about London and Westminster at AfC and saw that you previously declined it for being AI-generated. Could you explain what made you think that this page was AI-generated? When I run the version that you reviewed through GPTZero it gives the result of "highly confident that this text is entirely human", and all of the citations work and fully verify the article's claims based on my spotchecks.

In addition, it looks like the last three messages on your talk page are all expressing concerns about erroneous LLM declines. Could you please take a bit more care at AfC when assessing whether drafts are AI-generated? Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 14:22, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

I've had a look through your other AfC reviews and I'm concerned by a number of your other LLM declines as well. On 5 August you declined 39 drafts for being AI-generated, and for the majority of those I couldn't see any clear indications that the draft was actually written using AI. To give just a few examples:

• Draft:Russian Spiritual Mission in Beijing - OKA translation of an ruwiki article that has existed in broadly its current form since 2006. Could not plausibly be AI-generated.
• Draft:Lucy Kim - obviously not acceptable for mainspace in its current form, but GPTZero is "highly confident that the text is entirely human" and there are no dead links or other hallmarks of LLMs.
• Draft:Newsdrum - the language is far too unpolished for this to be AI-generated. Again GPTZero is "highly confident that the text is entirely human" and all of the links are functional.
• Draft:Naren J. Chitty - no hallmarks of AI use, and GPTZero is "highly confident that the text is entirely human". None of the four previous reviewers flagged this as AI-generated.
• Draft:Laurence Scott - imperfect draft by a new user, but does not read as remotely AI-generated and has none of the hallmarks of LLMs. GPTZero agrees that this is almost certainly human writing.
• Draft:Eli Fenichel - text doesn't read as at all AI-generated, and there are no issues with hallucinated citations.

MCE89 (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi @MCE89, can you run Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia under that as well as they rejected the page on similar LLM grounds and following that, another reviewer rejected by justifying LLM rejection and improving it by suggesting not enough sources/mentions despite over 20 sources. Few scholarly sources discuss the subject's role in entire pages and on several pages given the historical timeline of multiple events taking place in between. As I left my message here before, I particularly avoided this conversation as I checked their multiple declining of LLM reason without that being fit for the draft's rejection. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S ? spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 15:48, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@HillssaMansen19 If this is in reference to my review: 'another reviewer rejected by justifying LLM rejection and improving it by suggesting not enough sources/mentions despite over 20 sources'. I want to make clear this was not the case. That is evidenced by the initial message I left, viewable here. The previous review decline of Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia was regarding LLM usage, which I do not agree with. My decline reason was due to the sources only providing trivial mentions of the individual in question. I hope that clears this up! 11WB (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Similar concerns raised above -

Draft:Baher Abdulhai

Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia

An admin's message regarding previous reviews HilssaMansen19Irien1291S ? spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 15:55, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@MCE89 Firstly, regarding the Draft:Baher Abdulhai mentioned by @HilssaMansen19:

The statement "Abdulhai's work focuses on exploring the aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) based street and freeway traffic control..." is not supported by any citation. This kind of tone, which is vague and promotional, is commonly found in AI chatbots.

Likewise, the sentence "He examined the effects of real-time routing guidance and warning messages on traffic safety, emissions, and operations..." also lacks any cited source.

I believe the decline reason is valid in this case. The draft still requires cleanup for neutrality and the addition of reliable sources to support the claims. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 16:21, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@MCE89 As mentioned in point 5 of the advice section on Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup, tools like GPTZero are considered unreliable. Therefore, a careful reading and identification of AI-toned lines is necessary. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 16:31, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

In the Draft:Russian Spiritual Mission in Beijing, I noticed multiple instances that reflect AI chatbot–style writing, as outlined in WP:AIWTW, especially the section on undue emphasis on symbolism and importance.

@MCE89, as that section explains, such language is frequently produced by AI chatbots and often lacks proper sourcing or editorial neutrality. Some examples include:

"played a significant role in establishing and maintaining Russian-Chinese relations" — [This claim appears in the lead but is not supported by any citation.]

"Despite over a million Orthodox Russians in China during the interwar period..." [No source is provided to verify this figure, which seems extraordinary.]

"left a significant mark on global sinology" [This is a vague and subjective statement with no attribution.]

"remains a treasure of Russian sinology" [This phrase contains puffery and unverified praise, falling under both WP:PUFFERY and WP:AIWTW.]

I do not believe this is entirely human-written. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 16:50, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

That does not answer the use of a wrong reason to decline a number of drafts. There are various discussions going on here regarding such similar way of reviewing article. I reviewed a few as well and all seem to be problematic here. Can you come up with any valid arguments for Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia rejected for LLM use? The draft is well attributed, sources are valid scholarly, significant mentions, all points added verified and carefully written word to word by myself for many hours as visible in the history page. Your wrong review leads to wrong presentation to other reviewers as well who may not check it thoroughly given previous rejections as happened on this draft and conversation is going on about that as well. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S ? spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 16:44, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@MCE89, @HilssaMansen19 The decline reasons for the Draft:Bagh Singh Hallowalia are valid, especially starting from the very first line where the word "prominent" is used. This kind of promotional language is discouraged, as noted in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. It is a common term used by LLMs to quickly establish importance without evidence.

"Several scholars credit Sardar Bagh Singh Kalal of Hallo-Sadho who established Hallowal for a misl's establishment (which became Ahluwalia misl)" – But who are these scholars? This vague phrasing with passive voice falls under WP:AIWEASEL, which warns against unsourced plurality and generalizations typical of LLM writing.

"...predicting when he (Jassa Singh) becomes a prominent warrior/leader." – Again, the term prominent is subjective and lacks attribution.

Also, regarding the latest decline on the draft, another reviewer mentioned that the reason for rejection was based on trivial mentions, not due to any issue with my review. If you have doubts or questions about that decision, it would be more appropriate to post them on the reviewer's talk page. Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:21, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

You are again wrongly justifying LLM rejection by diverting as prominent is used instead of peacock terms like very important or famous or great etc. It is used widely as a substitute here Charan Singh, Chandra Shekhar, Meira Kumar and Lala Lajpat Rai. According to your false claims, these pages are also LLM written?

Check the adjacent sources for what is written or not. I am clearly avoiding words like "great leader" as written in the sources.

What is subjective and where does it lack attribution? Is that your ground for using LLM tag? Who are these various scholars? I have sourced it next and other references can be added here but still not arguable for your false claims. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S ? spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 17:32, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@HilssaMansen19, Thanks. Just clarifying it's not about making false claims. The word prominent might appear as a peacock term, and the part mentioning “several authors” was also noted. As an alternative, it can be changed to “was a Sikh leader.” I see the draft has been resubmitted. If you think I made a mistake in reviewing, I’ll step back and leave it there. :)) Jesus isGreat7 ?? | Ping Me 17:56, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

AFC Patroller removal

Hi JesusisGreat7, I have removed your access to the Articles for Creation Helper as I have some concerns about a number of your declines (as seen above in multiple threads). I would reccomend you focus your efforts elsewhere for now, and if you wish to apply again for AfC in future to please ensure you are careful to use the correct decline options or to ask for a second opinion if you are unsure. Best, CoconutOctopus talk 18:37, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Miserendino Caves. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thanks for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2025 (UTC)