特朗普签署备忘录将对中国商品大规模征收关税

This article is about the logical fallacy. For the historical quotation "Tu quoque, Brute, fili mi", see Et tu, Brute? For the play by John Cooke, see Greene's Tu Quoque. For legal defense, see Tu quoque defense.

百度 党的十九大报告指出，党的干部是党和国家事业的中坚力量，要建设高素质专业化干部队伍。

Tu quoque is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical. This specious reasoning is a special type of ad hominem attack. The Oxford English Dictionary cites John Cooke's 1614 stage play The Cittie Gallant as the earliest known use of the term in the English language.

Form and explanation

The (fallacious) tu quoque argument follows the template (i.e. pattern):

1. Person A claims that a statement X is true.
2. Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
3. Therefore, X is false.

For example:

1. Person A: "Smoking is associated with chronic health disorders. You shouldn't smoke."
2. Person B: "But you smoke yourself. So much for your argument!"

Person A makes a statement, and Person B reasons that because Person A is being hypocritical, their statement is false.

Similar concepts

A similar concept in politics is that of whataboutism; raising a counteraccusation, often in the form of a larger but unrelated issue. In the Soviet Union in the 1930s, the phrase "and you are lynching Negroes" was often raised against the United States.

See also

• Accusation in a mirror
• Clean hands
• False equivalence
• In pari delicto
• List of fallacies
• List of Latin phrases
• Matthew 7:5
• People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
• Psychological projection
• The pot calling the kettle black
• Two wrongs don't make a right
• Victor's justice

Further reading

• Agassi, Joseph (2008). "Rationality and the tu quoque argument". Inquiry. 16 (1–4): 395–406. doi:10.1080/00201747308601691.
• van Eemeren, Frans H.; Houtlosser, Peter (2003). "More about Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque". Ossa Conference Archive. University of Windsor.
• Govier, Tridy (1980). "Worries About Tu Quoque as a Fallacy". Informal Logic. 3 (3). University of Windsor: 2–4.
• Shapiro, Irving David (January 2011). "Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons" (PDF). Etc. 64 (1): 75–86. JSTOR 42578702. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2025-08-14.
• Marcus, Kenneth L. (2012). "Accusation in a Mirror". Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 43 (2): 357–93. SSRN 2020327.

External links

• Tu quoque fallacy – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy